The polls

Public mayoral polls tracked by this site, preserving which candidates and responses each firm reported.

32 public polls (1 not used in the forecast); latest used from Mainstreet Research, conducted Oct 7, 2026.

Polling support over time

Candidates appear only where a poll reported them. See every candidate on the ballot.

Shares among respondents naming a candidate, including leaners.

Not used in the forecast and left off this chart: Scope Research (Oct 6, 2026). The poll archive lists it and explains why.

12 polls since nominations closed. Lines are fitted to these polls only.

Polling trend summary. Points show support among respondents naming a candidate, including leaners where asked. All-respondent readings are converted to this basis across all reported candidate choices. Smoothed lines summarize these comparable shares; they are not polling averages or forecasts. A candidate missing from a poll is omitted, not counted as zero.

  • Olivia Chow: 12 polls shown, from 50.0% on Sep 5, 2026 to 47.2% on Oct 7, 2026. A smoothed trend line is shown. 1 chart point is derived from all-respondent shares; original figures remain in the archive.
  • Brad Bradford: 12 polls shown, from 39.0% on Sep 5, 2026 to 44.3% on Oct 7, 2026. A smoothed trend line is shown. 1 chart point is derived from all-respondent shares; original figures remain in the archive.
  • Chris Alexander: 10 polls shown, from 10.0% on Sep 5, 2026 to 9.0% on Oct 4, 2026. A smoothed trend line is shown. 1 chart point is derived from all-respondent shares; original figures remain in the archive.
  • Odessa Paloma Parker: 3 polls shown, from 1.9% on Sep 17, 2026 to 2.8% on Oct 7, 2026. Only reported points are shown, without a trend line.
  • Sarah McVie: 3 polls shown, from 2.5% on Sep 17, 2026 to 2.5% on Oct 7, 2026. Only reported points are shown, without a trend line.

The poll archive below contains every reported value and its source.

How the forecast has moved with each poll

Each candidate's chance of winning as it would have stood the day each poll was published, recomputed with the current model. It is not a record of what this site showed at the time. Polls are placed by publication date, since a poll can only move the forecast once it is out. As in the chart above, the line is a smoothed trend through the points.

11 poll releases published after Aug 21, 2026. Trend lines are fitted to these releases only.

Forecast history summary. Each point is each candidate's chance of winning after a poll release, recomputed with the current model. Smoothed lines summarize the direction of those points; the forecast itself changes only when a poll is published.

  • Olivia Chow: 69.2% after the poll published Aug 25, 2026; 68.7% after the latest, published Oct 9, 2026; 11 releases.
  • Brad Bradford: 30.3% after the poll published Aug 25, 2026; 31.3% after the latest, published Oct 9, 2026; 11 releases.
  • Chris Alexander: 0.6% after the poll published Aug 25, 2026; 0.0% after the latest, published Oct 9, 2026; 11 releases.

Poll archive

“Other reported choices” totals only responses the poll lists outside the forecast candidate columns; a dash means none is supplied. This feed does not include question wording or respondent base.

Public mayoral polls, newest first
DateFirmSampleOlivia ChowBrad BradfordChris AlexanderUndecidedOther reported choicesDenominatorSurvey method
Oct 7, 2026Mainstreet Research 100047%44%——9%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Not counted separately45%42%—8%6%All respondents (Chow or Bradford only)Interactive voice response (IVR)
Oct 6, 2026Scope Research Not used in the forecast310044%41%—11%5%All respondentsOnline survey (text-message invitation)
Why this poll is not used in the forecast

This poll is listed for the record but is not used in the forecast. Scope Research described its method only briefly: an online survey of people invited by text message, with no account of how respondents were chosen or weighted. Scope has not published earlier polls that can be checked against an election result, so there is no record yet of how accurate its polls are. Scope is also not a member of the Canadian Research Insights Council, the industry body that sets standards for Canadian polling firms.

Oct 6, 2026Forum Research 160446%42%——12%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Oct 4, 2026Nanos Research 75552%43%4%—1%Decided and leaning votersTelephone and online survey
Oct 4, 2026Liaison Strategies 100048%40%9%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 29, 2026Mainstreet Research 100045%38%9%—8%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Not counted separately47%41%—12%—All respondents (Chow or Bradford only)Interactive voice response (IVR)
Sep 27, 2026Liaison Strategies 100048%39%10%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 24, 2026Canada Pulse Insights 51051%34%9%—6%Decided and leaning votersOnline survey
Sep 23, 2026Forum Research 101446%35%6%—13%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 20, 2026Liaison Strategies 100047%40%10%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 17, 2026Mainstreet Research 100046%38%10%—7%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 8, 2026Ipsos 100636%21%4%30%8%All respondentsOnline survey
Sep 5, 2026Liaison Strategies 100050%39%10%—2%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Aug 21, 2026Pallas Data 80850%39%8%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Aug 16, 2026Liaison Strategies 100049%38%11%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Aug 5, 2026Liaison Strategies 100047%40%10%—3%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Jul 29, 2026Forum Research 101147%32%11%—10%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Jul 26, 2026Liaison Strategies 100049%41%——10%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Jun 30, 2026Liaison Strategies 100049%40%——10%Decided votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Jun 18, 2026Mainstreet Research 115744%38%——19%Decided votersText-to-online survey and interactive voice response
Not counted separately48%52%———Not stated (Chow or Bradford only)Text-to-online survey and interactive voice response
May 11, 2026Liaison Strategies 100050%37%——13%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Apr 13, 2026Liaison Strategies 100046%35%——19%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Mar 8, 2026Pallas Data 73544%26%——29%Decided votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Mar 8, 2026Liaison Strategies 100044%26%——30%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Feb 22, 2026Mainstreet Research 80243%17%——40%Decided votersInteractive voice response (Smart IVR)
Feb 2, 2026Liaison Strategies 100040%18%——42%Not statedInteractive voice response (IVR)
Dec 21, 2025Liaison Strategies 100039%16%——45%Decided votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Oct 23, 2025Liaison Strategies 100042%12%——46%Decided votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Sep 4, 2025Forum Research —36%13%——51%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Not counted separately40%42%—18%—Not stated (Chow or Bradford only)Interactive voice response (IVR)
Aug 29, 2025Ipsos 100133%———67%All respondentsOnline survey
Jul 6, 2025Liaison Strategies 100039%8%——53%Decided votersInteractive voice response (IVR)
Jun 7, 2025Pallas Data 61137%14%——49%Decided and leaning votersInteractive voice response (IVR)

Pollsters in the archive